Review: A Force So Swift

A Force So Swift: Mao, Truman, and the Birth of Modern China, 1949A Force So Swift: Mao, Truman, and the Birth of Modern China, 1949 by Kevin Peraino
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

A Force So Swift is essentially the story of a single year, 1949, in Chinese and American history. This year saw the victory of the Chinese Communists over the Nationalist forces and the creation of the Peoples Republic of China, as well as the beginning of the Nationalist government on Taiwan. In the US, President Truman had won the 1948 election and the events unfolding in China were the first big foreign policy challenge of his term of office.

The United States had provided support to the Nationalist forces in China since before the outbreak of Word War II. But after the defeat of Japan, the Nationalist forces Chiang Kai-shek simply could not stop the progress of the forces under Mao. In many cases it was not that they were defeated in battle, but that they just would not fight. Truman and his Secretary of State Dean Acheson realized that there was nothing that could be done to prevent the Nationalist defeat, but could not really say this out loud, due to the onset of the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

It’s a fascinating story of both domestic and international politics that is still relevant today; the relationship between the US and the Peoples Republic and Taiwan is very complex and this is a consequence of the events of 1949. The author has done a great job of creating a narrative out of these complicated events. Along the way we meet and get to know the main figures of Truman, Acheson, Mao and Chiang as well as Madame Chiang and people like Congressman Walter Judd. And there are also brief appearances by people like John Kennedy and Richard Nixon.

I really enjoyed this book. It is informative on many levels, from the events on the ground in East Asia to US domestic politics. If you’re interested in this time period or just curious about the relationship between the US and China, I strongly recommend this book.

Lent Devotion 2018

He said, “Go out and stand on the mountain before the Lord, for the Lord is about to pass by.” Now there was a great wind, so strong that it was splitting mountains and breaking rocks in pieces before the Lord, but the Lord was not in the wind; and after the wind an earthquake, but the Lord was not in the earthquake; and after the earthquake a fire, but the Lord was not in the fire; and after the fire a sound of sheer silence. When Elijah heard it, he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood at the entrance of the cave. Then there came a voice to him that said, “What are you doing here, Elijah?”

1 Kings 19:11-13

I love these verses with the message that sometimes God is in the silence. There are many places in the Bible where God guides His people with something more tangible, like a pillar of fire or a star, or perhaps He speaks from a burning bush or sets a rainbow in the sky. But here God was in the silence.

In August 1998 I went on a hiking trip with a small group in the Canadian Rockies. One of the most memorable days was our hike in the Bald Hills in Jasper National Park. We had a beautiful view of Maligne Lake as we hiked uphill, especially when we got above the tree line. When we reached the third (and final) summit, our leader suggested that we all sit down, close our eyes and just listen. It was a beautiful late summer day and after we all got comfortable, I could hear the wind moving through the long grass. There were no traffic noises or other distractions, just the sounds of God’s creation. In the distance I heard the cry of a hawk as it swooped down on its prey. And I heard the whistling sounds made by the hoary marmots in the valley below us. When we opened our eyes we were all smiling. Listening to the silence was an amazing experience. Sometimes God is in the silence.

God has given me many gifts but unlike Elijah, I do not have the gift of discernment. Certainly it would be much easier for me if God were in the great wind, or the earthquake or the fire, or a text message or an email or even a post on Facebook. But sometimes God is in the silence, and I know that I must listen carefully for Him.

Dear Lord, thank you for being there to guide us. Help us to listen carefully, especially in the silence, to discern Your will. Amen.

February 20, 2018

Review: Princes at War

Princes at War: The Bitter Battle Inside Britain's Royal Family in the Darkest Days of WWIIPrinces at War: The Bitter Battle Inside Britain’s Royal Family in the Darkest Days of WWII by Deborah Cadbury
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Princes at War is a study of the four surviving sons of George V from the Abdication Crisis of 1936 to the death of George VI in 1952. The eldest son became Edward VIII after his father’s death and became the Duke of Windsor after he abdicated. Prince Albert, the second son, became George VI after the abdication. Prince Henry became the Duke of Gloucester and Prince George, the youngest of the four, became Duke of Kent.

It is a very interesting book to read; certainly it is no substitute for a full biography of any of the four brothers, but it covers the activities of all four through this time period with a focus being primarily on the yers of the Second World War. I knew very little about the two younger brothers, and the author really develops a sense of who they were and what they did during this time period. Gloucester, from whom nothing much was expected, really came into his own and was a major support of George VI. Kent also buckled down, shed his playboy image, and worked hard at his post in the RAF until his death in a still somewhat mysterious plane crash in 1942.

The Duke and Duchess of Windsor are something quite different. Certainly both were impressed by Fascism and admired Hitler at least to some extent. In 1940, did this cross the line and become treason? This is still unclear to some extent, but in the summer of 1940 they were both more preoccupied with the furnishings of their houses in Occupied France than they were about the mortal peril that was facing the United Kingdom.

The hero of course is George VI who held the royal family together during the war years, and also rose to the occasion as the war-time head of state. His relationship with Churchill is fascinating, and could be the subject of a whole book by itself.

So if you’re interested in the royal family or Great Britain during World War II, I think you’ll find this book well worth your time.

Review: High Noon

High Noon: The Hollywood Blacklist and the Making of an American ClassicHigh Noon: The Hollywood Blacklist and the Making of an American Classic by Glenn Frankel
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

High Noon is the fascinating story of the making of a classic motion picture during the time of the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s. I picked up this book because I had seen the movie many years ago as part of a high school media class in high school. I loved the movie and I still do, but back then I had no idea of how intertwined the movie was with the politics of the time.

The book follows the careers of Gary Cooper (Marshal Kane), Carl Foreman (screenwriter), Stanley Kramer (producer) and Fred Zinnemann (director) leading to their work on High Noon. Along the way we learn about the Communist Party in America and the organization in Hollywood, plus the studio system and the political divisions of the motion picture industry. But when the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) comes on the scene things get very interesting indeed. Loyalty oaths, black lists and grey lists, all of these had a profound affect on the motion picture industry and indirectly on American culture.

Carl Foreman was a member of the Communist Party at one point, and was called to testify by HUAC during the filming of High Noon. And in some sense, some of the story of High Noon reflects Foreman’s experiences at this time.

I really enjoyed this book; it’s a fascinating book about art and politics and fear. And in some sense it’s still quite relevant today. I definitely recommend this book.

Review: Playing with Fire

Playing with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American PoliticsPlaying with Fire: The 1968 Election and the Transformation of American Politics by Lawrence O’Donnell
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Playing with Fire is an in depth look at the presidential campaign of 1968. As the author notes, it was a transformative year, not just for American politics but also for America as a nation. At the beginning of 1968, it did not look like a particularly interesting political year: the incumbent Democratic president, Lyndon Johnson was expected to be renominated by his party and face a Republican, probably Richard Nixon, in the fall election.

The biggest issue facing Johnson was the war in Vietnam. By late 1967 the war had started to become unpopular and Johnson faced increasing criticism within the Democratic party. One of Johnson’s principal critics was Robert Kennedy; the two men detested each other and had for many years. But Kennedy would not challenge a sitting president of his own party, so it fell to Gene McCarthy, a little known Democratic senator from Minnesota to run against Johnson in the New Hampshire primary.

That was the decision that changed history. The author tracks both the Republican and Democratic races for the nomination and then the fall election. On the Republican side there is Nixon, Rockefeller and Reagan; on the Democratic side there is Johnson, McCarthy, Kennedy, Humphrey and McGovern. It’s complicated story but the author does a good job of breaking it down into easy pieces. Including the October surprise which was about as close to treason as we are likely to ever see.

I was 11 years old during this campaign and I was fascinated by it. This book does a good job of explaining the sequence of events and the reasons behind them. There are some minor editing errors here and there but it’s worth reading if you are interested in politics or history.

Review: Apollo 8

Apollo 8: The Thrilling Story of the First Mission to the MoonApollo 8: The Thrilling Story of the First Mission to the Moon by Jeffrey Kluger
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Apollo 8 is the story of the first manned mission to the moon. It’s a truly amazing story; I was in fifth grade at the time and I remember the flight of Apollo 8 very well. The book follows the mission command Frank Borman, but we also learn the stories of Jim Lovell and Bill Anders as they join the space program and are eventually assigned to Project Apollo.

The Apollo 1 fire resulting in the deaths of three astronauts is a real turning point in the story; the US space program had been very successful to this point, and it seemed that accomplishing President Kennedy’s goal of landing a man on the moon by 1970 would be easy. The fire, which forced a major redesign of the Apollo spacecraft, put that into jeopardy. Apollo 8 was only the second manned mission in the Apollo spacecraft and the first manned mission to use the Saturn V rocket. It was a very bold decision to send the Apollo 8 crew on a mission to orbit the moon.

This is a great story and it is well-told. Jeffrey Kluger was Jim Lovell’s co-author on the story of Apollo 13, and like that book, this one is a good read. I heartily recommend this book.

Review: Dictator

Dictator (Cicero, #3)Dictator by Robert Harris
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Dictator is the third and final volume in the Cicero trilogy by Robert Harris. Dictator begins pretty much where the second volume Conspirata leaves off. This is the time of the First Triumvirate of Pompey, Crassus and Caesar, and the struggle to preserve the traditions of the Roman Republic. Cicero as an ex-consul is prominent among the opposition to the triumvirate.

You can easily Google Cicero and find out how the story ends, but in case you haven’t, there are some spoilers in the next two paragraphs.

Cicero’s strategy in opposition to the triumvirate is to try to divide them. As he knows and has worked with each of the three, he tries to play one off against the others. Given enough time, this might have worked, but Crassus dies during a campaign, and Caesar and Pompey go to war with each other. Cicero and most of the Senate favor Pompey – Caesar is far more dangerous to the Republic – but Caesar defeats Pompey who is later killed. Caesar then becomes the Dictator and Cicero bends with the wind and makes an accommodation with Caesar.

With Caesar’s victory in the civil war, the Roman Republic is on its last legs. Caesar does not rule wisely, to say the least, and an opposition group forms in the Senate, which includes Cicero, at least to some extent. He is not included in the group that eventually assassinates Caesar, though he does work with them to try to restore the structure of the Republic. The truth is that, as Cicero points out, the plotters did not plan for anything other than killing Caesar. This power vacuum leads to the rise of Marc Anthony, Octavian and Lepidus: the Second Triumvirate.

With the spoilers out of the way, this is an interesting period in Roman history, and through Cicero’s eyes we see again and again how power can corrupt. Cicero is not immune form this either as we have seen through the course of the trilogy, but his loyalty is to the Republic and he is not primarily concerned with increasing his own power at the expense of the Republic.

I enjoyed this book a lot. It’s a well-written conclusion to the trilogy, and even knowing how it ends, I still enjoyed reading the book. I definitely recommend this book if you are interested in this period of history.

Lent Devotion 2017

“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air; they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? And can any of you by worrying add a single hour to your span of life? Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What will we eat?’ or ‘What will we drink?’ or ‘What will we wear?’ For it is the Gentiles who strive for all these things; and indeed your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.

“So do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will bring worries of its own. Today’s trouble is enough for today.”

Matthew 6:25-27, 31-34

I am a worrier. That’s not always a bad thing. Sometimes I find that worrying about a problem or situation helps me find alternative solutions, so worrying can be constructive. But in most situations worrying just creates anxiety. I know I am being foolish: worrying about a winter storm will not reduce the snowfall and becoming anxious over medical tests will not change the results. I take my anxieties to God because I know He is in control, but even so, sometimes it’s just hard for me to let go of my fears.

I am also a runner. Last fall I signed up for my first marathon. Training for it was both exciting and worrisome; it’s much farther than I had ever run before. But when I became anxious I reflected on this passage from Matthew. The final verse is similar to a saying among distance runners: “run the mile you’re in.” In other words, stay focused on what you are doing now; don’t waste your energy worrying about the big hill at Mile 22 when you are still at Mile 4. Worrying will not make the big hill any smaller or easier to climb.

On race day, I prayed that I might run with hope and joy in my heart instead of worry. And I did! The race was an amazing experience, and even though I walked up that big hill at Mile 22, with God’s help I finished the marathon in the time range that I had hoped for.

Dear Lord, thank you for encouraging us to come to You with all our cares and worries and fears. Help us to “run the mile we’re in” and let go of our anxieties, secure in the knowledge that You love us and are always there for us. Amen.

March 21, 2017

Lent Devotion 2016

Brothers and sisters, join in imitating me, and observe those who live according to the example you have in us. For many live as enemies of the cross of Christ; I have often told you of them, and now I tell you even with tears. Their end is destruction; their god is the belly; and their glory is in their shame; their minds are set on earthly things. But our citizenship is in heaven, and it is from there that we are expecting a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. He will transform the body of our humiliation that it may be conformed to the body of his glory, by the power that also enables him to make all things subject to himself.

Therefore, my brothers and sisters, whom I love and long for, my joy and crown, stand firm in the Lord in this way, my beloved.

Philippians 3:17-4:1

In this passage Paul calls on us to imitate him, to live life as a Christian and not live a selfish life devoted to acquiring earthly things. On the surface this seems like a simple task; as Christians we know that, as Paul says, “our citizenship is in heaven” but in practice this may not be so easy. We live in a rich and materialistic society that provides plenty of things to distract us.

A few years ago one of my co-workers got a new smart phone and as we all admired it, he said, “Whoever dies with the most toys wins!” We all laughed at this, because we knew he was joking. But, to be honest, sometimes it is easy to get lost in all amazing gadgets that can clutter our lives.

To be sure, there is nothing wrong with having a new car, or a smart phone or a home entertainment center, or going to concerts, or running in races, or taking part in any of the things our society offers. But if these earthly things come between us and our citizenship in heaven, we would be better off without them.

Dear Lord, thank you for the many material things you have provided for us. Help us to keep these in the proper context so that they do not distract us from the life You want us to lead. Amen.

February 22, 2016

Review: Conspirata

Conspirata: A Novel of Ancient RomeConspirata: A Novel of Ancient Rome by Robert Harris
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Conspirata is the second volume of the Cicero trilogy by Robert Harris. It picks up where the previous volume Imperium leaves off, after the election of Cicero as on of the consuls of the Roman Republic. The book is divided into two parts, the first covers the year of Cicero’s consulship (63 B.C.) and the second part covers the four years after his term as consul.

The next paragraph contains some mild spoilers, so you may want to skip ahead.

As you might suspect from the title of the book, Cicero spends much of his consulship battling against a conspiracy that would fundamentally alter the structure of the Roman Republic. By the end of his year as consul, it seems that he has succeeded, and Cicero is hailed as the Father of the Republic. But, perhaps the conspiracy was deeper and more far-reaching than Cicero had believed. This is the subject of the second half of this volume.

This is an interesting period in the history of the Roman Republic, for it is in this time that the “First Triumvirate” – an alliance of Pompey, Crassus and Caesar – appears. The Triumvirate’s goal is not a greater Republic, but rather to enhance their own power and wealth. The politics of the wealthy elite appealing to the masses in the street, while gaining financial and political power, is not unlike the current politics in Europe and North America. Which again shows that there is no new thing under the sun.

I enjoyed this book a lot. It’s not quite as easy of a read as the first volume Imperium. It can be somewhat confusing to keep track of some of the minor characters, though thankfully the author has provided a glossary and a list of characters. If you’re interested in this period of history, this is a good book to read, though I would definitely recommend reading Imperium first.